Formal
Breakdowns in deductive structure where the conclusion does not follow from the form.
Logical Fallacies
A practical logical-fallacies reference with clear explanations, usable examples, and teaching tools.
Categories are diagnostic tags for the main way reasoning goes wrong, not topic labels or ideologies. Unlike families, they are not exclusive, so one fallacy can sit in several categories at once.
Breakdowns in deductive structure where the conclusion does not follow from the form.
Missteps involving probability, statistics, scope, quantity, or numerical expectations.
Faulty claims about what caused what, or what causal link has actually been shown.
Confusion created by wording, ambiguity, framing, or unstable definitions.
Errors caused by bad categories, weak distinctions, or distorted conceptual boundaries.
Arguments that overstate what the evidence shows, ignore what is missing, or misuse support.
Mistakes rooted in appearances, impressions, or the way something seems at first glance.
Errors caused by the wrong vantage point, historical standpoint, or interpretive frame.
Failures in belief management, confidence calibration, or standards for responsible belief.
Debate maneuvers that distract, derail, pressure, or strategically reroute the exchange.
Arguments that make feeling do the evidential work reasoning should have done.