Contextomy
Occurs when words are selectively excerpted from their original context in a way that changes or distorts what the speaker meant.
Logical Fallacies
A practical logical-fallacies reference with clear explanations, usable examples, and teaching tools.
Category
Confusion created by wording, ambiguity, framing, or unstable definitions.
Occurs when words are selectively excerpted from their original context in a way that changes or distorts what the speaker meant.
Occurs when a claim is rejected simply because the concept involved has blurry boundaries rather than a perfectly sharp cutoff.
Occurs when a substantive question is illegitimately 'solved' by defining one contested concept into another.
Occurs when a key word or phrase slides between different meanings inside the same argument, creating the illusion of support.
Occurs when a broad or harmless sense of a word is used to insinuate a narrower, stronger, or more loaded sense of the same word.
Occurs when a word's original or historical meaning is treated as if it controlled the word's present meaning.
Occurs when a condition that is necessary given someone's current description is treated as if it were permanently or universally necessary in the real world.
Occurs when a claim, practice, or idea is judged mainly by its origin rather than by its present content, evidence, or merits.
Occurs when the creator's intended meaning is treated as irrelevant in contexts where that intention is actually important to understanding the work or statement.
Occurs when someone protects a generalization from counterexamples by redefining the group with an ad hoc 'real' or 'true' membership test.
Occurs when a general principle is padded with so many exceptions that it no longer guides action or says much of substance.
Occurs when a claim is protected by an avalanche of words, side points, jargon, or branching assertions that overwhelm reasonable scrutiny and create the illusion of dept...
Occurs when an abstraction is spoken of as if it were a concrete agent or thing in a way that misleads rather than merely using harmless metaphor.
Occurs when a fuzzy, graded, or probabilistic position is forced into unnaturally sharp categories so it becomes easier to attack.
Occurs when one term in a meaningful contrast is redefined so broadly or so narrowly that its opposing term can no longer do any work.