Logical Fallacies

LogFall

A practical logical-fallacies reference with clear explanations, usable examples, and teaching tools.

Category

Emotional

Arguments that make feeling do the evidential work reasoning should have done.

Entries

17 fallacies in this category.

Diagnostic prompt

Would the argument still persuade if the emotional force were removed?

Category vs. family

A category is a diagnostic lens, so a fallacy may appear in more than one category. A family is the broader umbrella that gives the fallacy its single main home.

Ad hominem

Occurs when someone treats an attack on a person's character, motives, class, or biography as if it were a refutation of that person's argument.

TacticalEmotional
Foundational Middle school+

Appeal to authority

Occurs when someone treats an authority's endorsement as if it settled the issue, even when the authority is unqualified, the field is divided, or the claim still require...

EvidentialEmotional
Foundational Middle school+

Appeal to consequences

Occurs when someone treats the desirability or undesirability of a conclusion as if it were evidence that the conclusion is true or false.

EvidentialEmotional
Foundational Middle school+

Appeal to emotion

Occurs when a conclusion is pushed mainly by triggering fear, pity, outrage, pride, or hope rather than by showing that the conclusion follows from the evidence.

TacticalEmotionalEpistemic
Foundational Middle school+

Appeal to fear

Occurs when someone tries to secure agreement mainly by amplifying danger, threat, or panic rather than by showing that the conclusion is supported.

Emotional
Foundational Middle school+

Appeal to flattery

Occurs when someone tries to win agreement by flattering the audience's intelligence, courage, independence, or special insight instead of supplying the missing evidence.

Emotional
Foundational Middle school+

Appeal to motive

Occurs when a claim is dismissed by speculating about the speaker's motives instead of addressing the claim itself.

EmotionalCausal
Intermediate High school

Appeal to novelty

Occurs when something is treated as better mainly because it is new, cutting-edge, or marketed as the future.

PerspectivalEvidentialEmotional
Intermediate High school

Appeal to pity

Occurs when sympathy for a person or group is used as if it were evidence that a claim is true or a conclusion follows.

Emotional
Foundational Middle school+

Appeal to ridicule

Occurs when mockery, embarrassment, or derision is used in place of showing why a view is false.

Emotional
Foundational Middle school+

Appeal to spite

Occurs when resentment, bitterness, or hostility toward another group is used to drive support for a conclusion.

Emotional
Foundational Middle school+

Appeal to tradition

Occurs when a claim or practice is defended mainly because it has a long history, customary status, or familiar place in a community.

PerspectivalEvidentialEmotional
Intermediate High school

Argumentum ad baculum

Occurs when agreement is extracted by threat, intimidation, or coercive pressure rather than by showing that the claim is true.

TacticalEmotional
Foundational Middle school+

Confidence as a validator

Occurs when a speaker's certainty, intensity, or felt conviction is treated as if it were evidence that the claim is true.

EpistemicEvidentialEmotional
Intermediate High school

Red herring

Occurs when someone diverts attention from the unresolved issue by switching to a different issue that is easier, safer, or more emotionally useful.

TacticalEmotional
Foundational Middle school+

Sentimental fallacy

Occurs when the desirability, comfort, or emotional appeal of an outcome is treated as if that were evidence that the outcome is true, feasible, or justified.

EvidentialEmotional
Foundational Middle school+

Wishful thinking

Occurs when a belief or decision is driven mainly by what would be pleasing, hopeful, or comforting if true rather than by what the evidence supports.

EmotionalEpistemicEvidential
Foundational Middle school+