Logical Fallacies

LogFall

A practical logical-fallacies reference with clear explanations, usable examples, and teaching tools.

Category

Conceptual

Errors caused by bad categories, weak distinctions, or distorted conceptual boundaries.

Entries

51 fallacies in this category.

Diagnostic prompt

Are the categories being used carefully, or are unlike things being treated as alike?

Category vs. family

A category is a diagnostic lens, so a fallacy may appear in more than one category. A family is the broader umbrella that gives the fallacy its single main home.

Abstraction denial

Occurs when someone denies the reality or causal relevance of a higher-level pattern just because the pattern is realized through lower-level parts.

Conceptual
Foundational Middle school+

Abstraction fallacy

Occurs when a model, law, or abstraction drawn from experience is treated as if it were a logically necessary rule that reality cannot ever depart from.

Conceptual
Foundational Middle school+

Appeal to nature

Occurs when something is praised as good, safe, or right merely because it is called natural, or condemned as bad merely because it is called unnatural.

ConceptualEvidential
Intermediate High school

Argumentum ad populum

Occurs when a claim is treated as true, reasonable, or justified mainly because many people believe it, share it, or act on it.

EvidentialConceptualEpistemic
Advanced Advanced undergraduate

Bottom-up condemnation

Occurs when a negative generalization about a group is used as if it settled the character or behavior of a specific member of that group.

ConceptualEvidential
Foundational Middle school+

Bottom-up justification

Occurs when a positive generalization about a group is used as if it established the virtue or competence of a specific member of that group.

ConceptualEvidential
Foundational Middle school+

Composition fallacy

Occurs when something true of the parts is assumed to be true of the whole they compose.

Conceptual
Intermediate High school

Conjunction fallacy

Occurs when a more detailed scenario is treated as more probable than a less detailed scenario that already contains it.

ConceptualMathematical
Advanced Advanced undergraduate

Continuum fallacy

Occurs when a claim is rejected simply because the concept involved has blurry boundaries rather than a perfectly sharp cutoff.

ConceptualLinguistic
Intermediate High school

Definist fallacy

Occurs when a substantive question is illegitimately 'solved' by defining one contested concept into another.

LinguisticConceptual
Intermediate High school

Denying a remote hypothetical

Occurs when a hypothetical test case is dismissed as irrelevant merely because it is rare, extreme, or unlikely, even though the principle under debate is supposed to be...

EvidentialConceptual
Foundational Middle school+

Denying the correlative

Occurs when one side of a genuine contrast is denied or redefined so the opposing term has no place to apply.

Conceptual
Intermediate High school

Division fallacy

Occurs when something true of a whole is assumed to be true of each part or member of that whole.

Conceptual
Intermediate High school

Ecological fallacy

Occurs when statistics about a group are used to draw conclusions about particular individuals in that group.

MathematicalConceptual
Advanced Advanced undergraduate

Epistemic/ontological conflation

Occurs when the psychological or social effects of believing something are treated as evidence that the thing believed in actually exists or is true.

ConceptualEvidentialEpistemic
Intermediate High school

Fallacy of necessity

Occurs when a condition that is necessary given someone's current description is treated as if it were permanently or universally necessary in the real world.

LinguisticConceptual
Intermediate High school

False analogy

Occurs when one thing is treated as sufficiently like another even though the comparison breaks down at the point the argument depends on.

Conceptual
Intermediate High school

False compromise

Occurs when the midpoint between two positions is treated as correct simply because it lies between them.

Conceptual
Foundational Middle school+

False dilemma

Occurs when someone presents a limited set of options as if they were the only live possibilities, while reasonable alternatives are ignored or suppressed.

Conceptual
Foundational Middle school+

False equivalence

Occurs when two things are treated as equivalent in seriousness, meaning, or explanatory weight despite relevant differences that make the comparison misleading.

ConceptualEvidential
Foundational Middle school+

Faulty generalization

Occurs when an inductive conclusion reaches further than the available evidence can reasonably support, or ignores information that should limit the generalization.

ConceptualEvidential
Intermediate High school

For the sake of argument denial

Occurs when a hypothetical premise is rejected simply because the speaker does not actually believe it.

ConceptualEpistemic
Intermediate High school

Genetic fallacy

Occurs when a claim, practice, or idea is judged mainly by its origin rather than by its present content, evidence, or merits.

LinguisticConceptual
Advanced Intro college

Homunculus fallacy

Occurs when a mind-like inner observer is smuggled in to explain mind-like abilities, thereby postponing rather than solving the explanation.

ConceptualPerspectival
Intermediate High school

Human standard fallacy

Occurs when a human classification, rule, or label is treated as if it automatically determined the underlying fact or moral status.

ConceptualPerspectival
Intermediate High school

Impotent logical space

Occurs when a view is framed so every possible outcome fits it equally well, leaving no meaningful room for the claim to fail.

EvidentialConceptual
Foundational Middle school+

Incomplete comparison

Occurs when one option is called better, worse, cheaper, safer, or more effective without specifying the relevant comparison class or the other factors that matter.

Conceptual
Foundational Middle school+

Inconsistent comparison

Occurs when different comparison targets are used across different dimensions to create the illusion of one all-around winner.

ConceptualEvidential
Foundational Middle school+

Is-ought problem

Occurs when a descriptive claim about what is common, natural, or actual is treated as if it directly established what ought to be done.

Conceptual
Foundational Middle school+

Linearity fallacy

Occurs when someone assumes that doubling the input will double the output even though the system has thresholds, saturation, feedback loops, or diminishing returns.

ConceptualMathematical
Advanced Advanced undergraduate

Naturalistic fallacy

Occurs when something is treated as good, safe, or morally preferable mainly because it is called natural, traditional, or closer to nature.

ConceptualEvidential
Foundational Middle school+

Nirvana fallacy

Occurs when a realistic option is rejected because it does not solve a problem perfectly or because an imagined ideal is used as the standard of comparison.

Conceptual
Foundational Middle school+

No True Scotsman

Occurs when someone protects a generalization from counterexamples by redefining the group with an ad hoc 'real' or 'true' membership test.

ConceptualLinguistic
Foundational Middle school+

Overwhelming exception

Occurs when a general principle is padded with so many exceptions that it no longer guides action or says much of substance.

LinguisticConceptual
Advanced Intro college

Package-deal fallacy

Occurs when traits that are often bundled together by stereotype, tradition, or habit are treated as if they must always come as a package.

Conceptual
Foundational Middle school+

Pathetic fallacy

Occurs when human feelings, intentions, or judgments are projected onto impersonal things and then treated as if the projection explained reality.

ConceptualPerspectival
Advanced Intro college

Perfect solution fallacy

Occurs when a useful solution is dismissed because it does not fully solve the problem or because some flaws would remain afterward.

ConceptualEvidential
Foundational Middle school+

Perfect standard

Occurs when a messy range of better and worse cases is collapsed into a rigid perfect-or-failed binary.

Conceptual
Foundational Middle school+

Perverted analogy

Occurs when an analogy is deliberately stretched past its intended point so it can be mocked or refuted.

TacticalConceptual
Intermediate High school

Proof by example

Occurs when one or a few examples are offered as if they were enough to establish a universal claim.

ConceptualEvidential
Foundational Middle school+

Reification

Occurs when an abstraction is spoken of as if it were a concrete agent or thing in a way that misleads rather than merely using harmless metaphor.

ConceptualLinguisticPerspectival
Intermediate High school

Sharpshooter fallacy

Occurs when someone highlights the data cluster that supports a favored story only after looking at the results, then treats that hand-picked pattern as if it had been th...

EvidentialConceptual
Intermediate High school

Single cause fallacy

Occurs when a complex outcome is explained as if one cause alone did the work, while other relevant causes are ignored or illegitimately minimized.

CausalConceptual
Foundational Middle school+

Slippery slope

Occurs when someone claims that a relatively small first step will trigger a chain of worsening outcomes without showing why that chain is likely, stable, or hard to stop...

CausalConceptual
Foundational Middle school+

Special pleading

Occurs when someone asks for an exception to a rule or standard but does not provide a relevant reason for why the favored case should be exempt.

EvidentialConceptual
Foundational Middle school+

Suppressed correlative

Occurs when one term in a meaningful contrast is redefined so broadly or so narrowly that its opposing term can no longer do any work.

ConceptualLinguistic
Intermediate High school

Teleological fallacy

Occurs when a purpose, goal, or final destination is attributed to something without adequate evidence that such an end point was built into it.

Conceptual
Foundational Middle school+

Top-down condemnation

Occurs when a negative trait found in one member of a group is used to condemn the group as a whole.

ConceptualEvidential
Foundational Middle school+

Top-down faulty generalization

Occurs when a reasonable generalization is attacked by demanding that it hold without relevant scope conditions or exceptions.

ConceptualEvidential
Intermediate High school

Top-down justification

Occurs when a positive trait found in one member of a group is used to justify a positive conclusion about the group as a whole.

ConceptualEvidential
Foundational Middle school+

Witness chain

Occurs when testimony is padded by unverifiable references to other alleged witnesses, creating the illusion of corroboration without actually providing independent suppo...

EvidentialConceptual
Foundational Middle school+