Logical Fallacies

LogFall

A practical logical-fallacies reference with clear explanations, usable examples, and teaching tools.

Family

Persuasive/Appeal Fallacy

The argument leans on emotional, social, or rhetorical force where evidence or reasoning should do the work.

Entries

23 fallacies in this family.

Quick family question

What emotional, social, or rhetorical pressure is standing in for actual support?

Family vs. category

A family is the broad umbrella that gives a fallacy its main home. Categories are the narrower diagnostic tags, so the same fallacy can appear in multiple categories while still belonging to one family.

Appeal to accomplishment

Occurs when a claim is treated as true or weighty mainly because the person promoting it has impressive accomplishments in some other domain.

TacticalEvidential
Foundational Middle school+

Appeal to authority

Occurs when someone treats an authority's endorsement as if it settled the issue, even when the authority is unqualified, the field is divided, or the claim still require...

EvidentialEmotional
Foundational Middle school+

Appeal to consequences

Occurs when someone treats the desirability or undesirability of a conclusion as if it were evidence that the conclusion is true or false.

EvidentialEmotional
Foundational Middle school+

Appeal to emotion

Occurs when a conclusion is pushed mainly by triggering fear, pity, outrage, pride, or hope rather than by showing that the conclusion follows from the evidence.

TacticalEmotionalEpistemic
Foundational Middle school+

Appeal to fear

Occurs when someone tries to secure agreement mainly by amplifying danger, threat, or panic rather than by showing that the conclusion is supported.

Emotional
Foundational Middle school+

Appeal to flattery

Occurs when someone tries to win agreement by flattering the audience's intelligence, courage, independence, or special insight instead of supplying the missing evidence.

Emotional
Foundational Middle school+

Appeal to nature

Occurs when something is praised as good, safe, or right merely because it is called natural, or condemned as bad merely because it is called unnatural.

ConceptualEvidential
Intermediate High school

Appeal to novelty

Occurs when something is treated as better mainly because it is new, cutting-edge, or marketed as the future.

PerspectivalEvidentialEmotional
Intermediate High school

Appeal to pity

Occurs when sympathy for a person or group is used as if it were evidence that a claim is true or a conclusion follows.

Emotional
Foundational Middle school+

Appeal to poverty

Occurs when a claim is treated as more trustworthy, virtuous, or true mainly because its proponent is poor, ordinary, or from humble circumstances.

Tactical
Foundational Middle school+

Appeal to ridicule

Occurs when mockery, embarrassment, or derision is used in place of showing why a view is false.

Emotional
Foundational Middle school+

Appeal to spite

Occurs when resentment, bitterness, or hostility toward another group is used to drive support for a conclusion.

Emotional
Foundational Middle school+

Appeal to tradition

Occurs when a claim or practice is defended mainly because it has a long history, customary status, or familiar place in a community.

PerspectivalEvidentialEmotional
Intermediate High school

Appeal to wealth

Occurs when a claim is treated as more credible or correct mainly because it comes from a rich, famous, or financially successful person.

Tactical
Foundational Middle school+

Argument from repetition

Occurs when repetition is treated as if it adds evidence, wearing down doubt or making a claim seem true through familiarity.

Tactical
Foundational Middle school+

Argumentum ad baculum

Occurs when agreement is extracted by threat, intimidation, or coercive pressure rather than by showing that the claim is true.

TacticalEmotional
Foundational Middle school+

Argumentum ad populum

Occurs when a claim is treated as true, reasonable, or justified mainly because many people believe it, share it, or act on it.

EvidentialConceptualEpistemic
Advanced Advanced undergraduate

Chronological snobbery

Occurs when an idea is dismissed mainly because it is old, premodern, or associated with a period that also held many false beliefs.

EvidentialPerspectival
Intermediate High school

Confidence as a validator

Occurs when a speaker's certainty, intensity, or felt conviction is treated as if it were evidence that the claim is true.

EpistemicEvidentialEmotional
Intermediate High school

Misleading vividness

Occurs when a striking anecdote or emotionally intense case is used to make a problem seem more common, clear, or representative than the broader evidence allows.

TacticalPerceptualEvidential
Foundational Middle school+

Sentimental fallacy

Occurs when the desirability, comfort, or emotional appeal of an outcome is treated as if that were evidence that the outcome is true, feasible, or justified.

EvidentialEmotional
Foundational Middle school+

Style over substance fallacy

Occurs when the polish, confidence, charisma, or dramatic force of a presentation is treated as if it established the quality of the argument itself.

TacticalPerceptual
Foundational Middle school+

Wishful thinking

Occurs when a belief or decision is driven mainly by what would be pleasing, hopeful, or comforting if true rather than by what the evidence supports.

EmotionalEpistemicEvidential
Foundational Middle school+