Ad hominem
Occurs when someone treats an attack on a person's character, motives, class, or biography as if it were a refutation of that person's argument.
Logical Fallacies
A practical logical-fallacies reference with clear explanations, usable examples, and teaching tools.
Teaching path
A foundational sequence for first-time readers and classrooms starting with the fallacies they are most likely to meet in ordinary discussion.
Use the order below as a lesson sequence, review set, or comparison track.
Occurs when someone treats an attack on a person's character, motives, class, or biography as if it were a refutation of that person's argument.
Occurs when someone treats an authority's endorsement as if it settled the issue, even when the authority is unqualified, the field is divided, or the claim still require...
Occurs when a conclusion is pushed mainly by triggering fear, pity, outrage, pride, or hope rather than by showing that the conclusion follows from the evidence.
Occurs when an argument quietly assumes the very point it is supposed to prove, so the conclusion is built into the premises.
Occurs when someone selects only the evidence that supports a conclusion and ignores a wider body of evidence that weakens, qualifies, or reverses it.
Occurs when someone treats a correlation, coincidence, or time pattern as if it already established that one factor caused the other.
Occurs when someone presents a limited set of options as if they were the only live possibilities, while reasonable alternatives are ignored or suppressed.
Occurs when someone draws a broad conclusion from too little evidence, too small a sample, or a badly skewed sample.
Occurs when someone protects a generalization from counterexamples by redefining the group with an ad hoc 'real' or 'true' membership test.
Occurs when someone claims that a relatively small first step will trigger a chain of worsening outcomes without showing why that chain is likely, stable, or hard to stop...
Occurs when someone replaces an opponent's actual position with a weaker, more extreme, or simplified version and then refutes that easier target.
Occurs when criticism is answered not by engaging the issue, but by pointing to similar hypocrisy or wrongdoing elsewhere.