Ad hominem
Occurs when someone treats an attack on a person's character, motives, class, or biography as if it were a refutation of that person's argument.
Logical Fallacies
A practical logical-fallacies reference with clear explanations, usable examples, and teaching tools.
Teaching path
A classroom-ready path centered on the moves that appear constantly in campaigns, punditry, and online argument.
Use the order below as a lesson sequence, review set, or comparison track.
Occurs when someone treats an attack on a person's character, motives, class, or biography as if it were a refutation of that person's argument.
Occurs when someone tries to secure agreement mainly by amplifying danger, threat, or panic rather than by showing that the conclusion is supported.
Occurs when someone treats an authority's endorsement as if it settled the issue, even when the authority is unqualified, the field is divided, or the claim still require...
Occurs when a contested claim is simply asserted, often confidently, without the evidence needed to justify it.
Occurs when someone selects only the evidence that supports a conclusion and ignores a wider body of evidence that weakens, qualifies, or reverses it.
Occurs when someone presents a limited set of options as if they were the only live possibilities, while reasonable alternatives are ignored or suppressed.
Occurs when two things are treated as equivalent in seriousness, meaning, or explanatory weight despite relevant differences that make the comparison misleading.
Occurs when evidence that was supposed to satisfy a stated standard is dismissed and a new, harder standard is introduced so the conclusion never has to be reconsidered.
Occurs when someone diverts attention from the unresolved issue by switching to a different issue that is easier, safer, or more emotionally useful.
Occurs when someone claims that a relatively small first step will trigger a chain of worsening outcomes without showing why that chain is likely, stable, or hard to stop...
Occurs when someone replaces an opponent's actual position with a weaker, more extreme, or simplified version and then refutes that easier target.
Occurs when criticism is answered not by engaging the issue, but by pointing to similar hypocrisy or wrongdoing elsewhere.