Anecdotal fallacy
Occurs when a vivid personal story, testimonial, or isolated case is treated as stronger evidence than broader, better, or more representative evidence.
Logical Fallacies
A practical logical-fallacies reference with clear explanations, usable examples, and teaching tools.
Teaching path
A comparison path for near neighbors that students and readers regularly collapse into one another.
Use the order below as a lesson sequence, review set, or comparison track.
Occurs when a vivid personal story, testimonial, or isolated case is treated as stronger evidence than broader, better, or more representative evidence.
Occurs when someone treats an authority's endorsement as if it settled the issue, even when the authority is unqualified, the field is divided, or the claim still require...
Occurs when someone treats a correlation, coincidence, or time pattern as if it already established that one factor caused the other.
Occurs when one thing is treated as sufficiently like another even though the comparison breaks down at the point the argument depends on.
Occurs when someone presents a limited set of options as if they were the only live possibilities, while reasonable alternatives are ignored or suppressed.
Occurs when two things are treated as equivalent in seriousness, meaning, or explanatory weight despite relevant differences that make the comparison misleading.
Occurs when an inductive conclusion reaches further than the available evidence can reasonably support, or ignores information that should limit the generalization.
Occurs when someone draws a broad conclusion from too little evidence, too small a sample, or a badly skewed sample.
Occurs when negative framing is introduced in advance so that whatever a person says next will be dismissed before it is fairly heard.
Occurs when someone infers that because one event happened before another, the earlier event caused the later one.
Occurs when someone treats an attack on a person's character, motives, class, or biography as if it were a refutation of that person's argument.
Occurs when support for a claim is borrowed from a source that is fabricated, misquoted, unqualified, anonymous in the wrong way, or otherwise not what it is presented to...